The opinions of the Greek philosophers in the beginnings of philosophical

Abstract

Criticism is the disclosure of the truth through the limits of reason in the field of knowledge. As for the critical position, which represents the first test in the formation of personal decision and free will, and also represents the awareness of the complex and probabilistic situation of man, and the critical position consists of social events that are new, complex and multiple, and thus it is not Necessarily, the critical position is a solution to the dialectic. One of the critical positions is the criticism of philosophy in its western and eastern aspects. We find that the problems of philosophy never end, even with the passage of time and in our present time. If we look at the definition of philosophy, we find that there are many in different definitions, for example, that it is the search for existence with what exists, and it was also known as fighting myth and realizing it or understanding the new reality and overthrowing its various dimensions, and this is what Al-Farabi was known for. Thus, the point of difference in the definitions of philosophy, whether it is from the philosophers of Greece themselves or from the philosophers of the East, and from this point, how can there be no arguments about ideas and opinions about the origin of the emergence of philosophy, and this problem is one of the oldest philosophical problems that are still up to now, and many contemporary thinkers have dealt with it. . The philosophical question that revolves around this problem is which one comes first in philosophy, is it the East or the West, and I do not claim integration and that I have reached the goal. Rather, my study represents a point in the search for the problem of the origin of philosophy.